You're reading...

How can a Christian be tolerant of other religions and still evangelize?

            This is a question that I have been asked directly on more than one occasion.  Whether or not you have been asked it yourself, I think the odds are good that you have at least heard or seen it asked somewhere.  I think one of the main reasons why many people see such a contradiction (and thus hypocrisy) in Christians who say they support religious tolerance while also continuing to witness to non-believers is because of a fundamental misunderstanding of what we mean by religious tolerance

            Now I have to admit that religious tolerance surely means different things to different people, but for me at least it has never been incompatible with evangelizing.  I think that people of all religious traditions should have the freedom to pursue their beliefs as they see fit (probably excluding human sacrifices and such, though a religion sacrificing its converts might soon find itself with none left).  That is the core of religious tolerance; freedom.  It is about being willing to listen to other beliefs even though you may disagree.  It doesn’t require you to believe that all religions are equally true, nor does it even prevent you from criticizing the actions of certain religious groups.  In fact the statement of Christians (or any group for that matter) that our beliefs are correct while contrary belief systems are incorrect doesn’t in itself constitute intolerance. 

            To give you a (poorly constructed) analogy, imagine you play trumpet and your friend plays clarinet.  You believe that trumpets are clearly superior, and attempt at length to convince your friend of the merits of trumpets so that he’ll give up his clarinet and join you.  Now whether your friend does or doesn’t choose to go buy a trumpet doesn’t mean that clarinet playing should be banned and trumpets forcibly made the only instrument. 

            In the past I have also heard Christians called intolerant particularly for their beliefs (and outspokenness) about the behaviors of others.  This especially crops up when discussing issues such as abortion or homosexuality.  Unfortunately, I think many Christians can go too far with their words and actions, but this doesn’t mean that simply the act of speaking out about the actions of others makes you intolerant.  This is true for the same reasons Christians can believe their religious views are correct and others are not without being intolerant.  Tolerance doesn’t require you to accept every different idea out there, merely that you be willing to listen.  In a somewhat ironic twist, it’s been my experience at least that those who yell loudest about Christian intolerance are being just as intolerant as the people they decry.

            Strangely though, I have also heard some people say that religious intolerance is a good thing, that Christians should in no way tolerate false religions or gods, that the Bible itself teaches religious intolerance.  I think I can at least understand where someone might be coming from who held this view, but I think they also have largely misinterpreted the message.  We shouldn’t force Christianity upon anyone; they should come to it of their own volition.  When people attempt to do this, through physical violence or written law, it does much more harm than good.  It gives Christians everywhere a bad name, and degrades the reputation of Christianity itself.  And how do we know that those ‘converts’ are truly Christians?  If someone forces you to choose something, can you honestly say you had a choice at all?  Christ told us to go and make disciples of all nations, but he also gave us free will.  And if God gave us something, who is man to take it away?



4 thoughts on “How can a Christian be tolerant of other religions and still evangelize?

  1. Good post. I think for me I have to remember that my job in disciple making is merely to procliam the message of Jesus. I am not required to convince or even solict a response to the proclamation. I think that is where most folks get in trouble. They forget that when someone mocks or rejects the message of Christ it is not the messeger being mocked or rejected but rather it Jesus. I think it is hurt feelings that often produces the rhetoric that evokes the relious intolerence claims. I think we should honestly proclaim the exclusive message of slavation in Christ with a love and compassion that honors Jesus while gaurding ourselves from the superior feelings that being exlusive sometimes produces.

    Grace and Peace,


    Posted by Tony | June 10, 2011, 7:32 AM
  2. Wow, I think you make a lot of good points here. I especially liked your clarinet/trumpet analogy, and I like the fact that you’re so clear about people coming to Christianity or Buddhism, or Islam of their own volition. A couple thoughts I had as I read this….to me, tolerance means respect for the opinions of others, even though they don’t agree with ones we ourselves hold. I personally think it’s prideful and arrogant for anyone to say that what they believe or what they do is the best way. Even in relation to actions, i.e. abortion, homosexuality….it may not be a thing that’s right for me, but who am I to judge what is right for others? That’s God’s job, not mine.
    As far as evangelizing goes, totally agree that forcing someone into a choice is not a choice. Jesus, on several occasions, said “he who has ears, let them hear”. To me, that’s pretty clear instruction about how we evangelize….we simply state our case, and the seeds will fall and grow, or not, in some cases. And, of course, living a life that glorifies God is the best evangelizing any Christian can do. With that said, we need to remember to love our neighbor, even if they don’t agree with us. 🙂

    Posted by goddoglover | June 10, 2011, 11:12 AM
  3. I like this post and believe you made many good points. ultimately, God has the last word and our only job is to testify what we know about our God, love Him and love others. those come from, maturity, our personal experiences and the Word. if that means that God uses us or our testimony to grow a desire in someone else for Christ then awesome, but it’s still their journey to take.

    Posted by linds | June 10, 2011, 1:06 PM
  4. I really liked this post, many good points. This is something I have thought about a lot before too, you just put the words in my mouth. Maybe the main this how we approach those differences. When I think of being religiously intolerant I think of opposing them in near angry, telling them they’re wrong and showing why we’re right. But that doesn’t work, it just makes people mad and drives them away from God. Really the main point of that is to prove we’re right, not to show them the truth. I think the reason approach should be in love, genuine love for the person, not just love for making see right. In all things for all people we should approach them in love, it’s ok to disagree, but are we doing so in love?

    Posted by Curtis Poor | June 13, 2011, 2:24 PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3 other followers

Monthly Archives

Share this blog

Bookmark and Share
Submit my blog Society
%d bloggers like this: